JAMA network open
Maternal Vaccination vs Nirsevimab Use and Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection Among Full-Term Infants
By Jacobson KB, Watson AJ, Liao LD and 4 others.
Abstract
Importance: Since 2023, infants can be protected from respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) through a vaccine (RSVpreF) for pregnant persons or a monoclonal antibody (nirsevimab) for infants.
Objective
To assess the relative product effectiveness (rPE) of maternal RSVpreF vs infant nirsevimab against RSV infection and hospitalization among infants born in the 2023 to 2025 RSV seasons. Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study included full-term infants born at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), an integrated health care system with approximately 40 000 births each year, from December 3, 2023, to March 30, 2024, or September 29, 2024, to March 15, 2025. Infants protected by RSVpreF were matched to infants protected with nirsevimab with optimal full matching (up to 1:5), adjusting for birth week, sex, and maternal factors. Each group was also compared with infants with no protection, matching unprotected infants to both RSVpreF and nirsevimab infants (up to 1:10). Exposures: Maternal RSVpreF at 32 to 36 weeks' gestation or infant nirsevimab through age 7 days. Main outcomes and measures: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed RSV and RSV hospitalization (PCR-confirmed RSV 10 days before to 7 days after hospitalization) in infants aged 8 to 180 days or through RSV season end (April 30 in both seasons). rPE was estimated from age 8 to 180 days using restricted mean time lost.



