Endoscopy
Cold versus hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection for 10-19-mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized trial
By Jiang Q, An X, Yan X and 16 others.
Abstract
Background
Evidence for cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (CS-EMR) in 10-19-mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps is scarce. We conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare CS-EMR against hot snare EMR (HS-EMR) in this setting.
Methods
We enrolled patients with 10-19-mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps from 15 centers. Eligible polyps were individually randomized (1:1) to CS-EMR or HS-EMR. The primary outcome was histologic complete resection, analyzed in modified intention-to-treat (mITT) and per-protocol (PP) populations (noninferiority margin -10%). Secondary outcomes included en bloc resection, intraprocedural and delayed adverse events, and resection time.
Results
216 patients with 233 eligible polyps were included (CS-EMR 116; HS-EMR 117). In the mITT analysis, complete resection was 90.4% in the CS-EMR group and 93.2% in the HS-EMR group (difference -2.7%, 95%CI -9.8 to 4.3), showing noninferiority of CS-EMR vs. HS-EMR. PP results were consistent (CS-EMR 93.3%; HS-EMR 93.2%; difference 0.2%, 95%CI -6.7 to 7.1). CS-EMR was noninferior for 10-14-mm polyps (94.3% vs. 94.0%; 95%CI -6.8 to 7.2) but not for 15-19-mm polyps (78.6% vs. 90.9%; 95%CI -30.4 to 5.8), although interaction was not significant. En bloc resection rates and resection time were similar between groups. Intraprocedural bleeding was more frequent with CS-EMR (19.1% vs. 3.4%), whereas delayed bleeding was rare (0.0% vs. 0.9%), and no perforation occurred in either group.