Chargement de votre page…
Journal of clinical medicine
Par Ben Othman R, Trabelsi S, Dergaa I et 6 autres.
Contenu en anglais
Disordered eating behaviors (DEBs) and psychological distress may complicate type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) care.
Ward réunit ces articles dans la même app que vos cartes et vos questions. Un seul compte gratuit pour Ward, Suture, Osler et Prognia.
To estimate the frequency of DEB screening positivity and examine associated characteristics in a Tunisian T2DM clinic sample.
This cross-sectional study included 400 adults assessed between January and April 2023 using the Sick, Control, One stone, Fat, Food (SCOFF) questionnaire; Bulimic Investigatory Test Edinburgh (BITE); four-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4); and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Exploratory analysis estimated crude prevalence ratios (PRs). Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) came from a logistic model including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), diabetes duration, and PSS-4. Separate secondary models replaced PSS-4 with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale anxiety subscale (HADS-A) or depression subscale (HADS-D).
DEB positivity was 26.8% (107/400; 95% confidence interval [CI], 22.6-31.3%). Crude DEB prevalence was higher in women than men (30.4% versus 19.2%; PR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.06-2.35), in participants with HADS-A ≥11 versus <11 (PR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.64-3.17), and with HADS-D ≥11 versus <11 (PR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.08-2.05). In the primary adjusted model, DEB positivity was associated with younger age (aOR per year, 0.952; 95% CI, 0.922-0.982), higher BMI (aOR per kg/m2, 1.083; 95% CI, 1.042-1.126), and higher PSS-4 (aOR per point, 1.133; 95% CI, 1.067-1.203). HADS scores were positively associated in separate adjusted models. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was high in both groups (10.36% versus 9.91%; difference, 0.45 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.92).
Approximately one-quarter of this clinic sample had a positive DEB screen. Associations with psychological symptoms support attention to eating concerns and emotional well-being in diabetes care. However, cross-sectional data limit causal interpretation, and future longitudinal studies are warranted.
Publié dans Journal of clinical medicine. Le résumé est reproduit tel qu’il a été publié et reste l’œuvre de ses auteurs ; lisez l’article complet à la source.
Prognia référence cet article à des fins de documentation et de formation. Il ne constitue pas un avis médical. Lisez toujours l’original et suivez les recommandations en vigueur et les protocoles locaux avant d’agir.
