JMIR medical informatics
Von Jang B, Park E, Lee S und 8 weiteren.
Inhalt auf Englisch
With the rapid expansion of health care data, multiple international standardized terminology systems have been developed and refined to ensure semantic interoperability, which is a crucial factor in facilitating collaborative use.
Ward bringt diese Artikel in dieselbe App wie deine Karten und Fragen. Ein kostenloses Konto für Ward, Suture, Osler und Prognia.
This study aimed to evaluate the real-world use and applicability of standardized terminology systems by mapping clinical terms from routine cancer care and to propose guidelines that optimize mapping.
Clinical terms generated during cancer care at the National Cancer Center Korea were extracted and mapped to multiple target terminology systems: the Korean Standard Classification of Diseases; International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification; Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes; RxNorm; Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification; and Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT). A multidisciplinary working group of health care information managers, data experts, and oncologists verified the mapping outcomes, calculated the cross-verification discordance rate, and compared the coverage across systems.
A total of 3472 source terms were identified across 7 domains: chief complaint, diagnosis, laboratory test, imaging test, surgery/procedure, medication, and radiation therapy. With postcoordination and predefined mapping guidelines, SNOMED CT achieved high overall mapping rates (98.3%-100%) across domains. Applying postcoordination as needed substantially improved exact semantic match rates, which exceeded 90% in most domains. However, more than 40% of source terms were broadly mapped in the imaging test and radiation therapy domains because procedural details such as imaging technique and radiation field configuration could not be represented in SNOMED CT. The cross-verification discordance rate between mappers, defined as the proportion of source terms with disagreement, remained low (0.3%-1.3%). RxNorm and Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes showed complementary strengths within their specialized domains, adding detail or specificity where SNOMED CT was less complete.
Standardized terminology systems are feasible and effective in encoding clinical terms for cancer care. SNOMED CT was the most comprehensive, and predefined mapping guidelines provide a structured framework for mapping and consensus resolution. Domain-specific systems should be used alongside SNOMED CT, and all systems should be updated regularly to reflect evolving clinical practice.
Erschienen in JMIR medical informatics. Das Abstract steht hier so, wie es veröffentlicht wurde, und bleibt das Werk seiner Autoren; den vollständigen Artikel liest du an der Quelle.
Prognia führt diesen Artikel zum Nachschlagen und für die Aus- und Weiterbildung. Er ist keine medizinische Beratung. Lies immer das Original und halte dich an die aktuellen Leitlinien und lokalen Standards, bevor du danach handelst.
