Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare
Von Prasetyo A, Pramukti I, Kurniawan T und 1 weiteren.
Inhalt auf Englisch
Digital technologies are increasingly used to extend post-stroke rehabilitation and recovery support beyond conventional face-to-face services. However, the evidence remains heterogeneous in delivery, intervention content, and outcomes assessed.
Ward bringt diese Artikel in dieselbe App wie deine Karten und Fragen. Ein kostenloses Konto für Ward, Suture, Osler und Prognia.
To map the delivery method, intervention content, and reported outcomes of digital interventions supporting post-stroke rehabilitation and recovery.
This scoping review followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework and PRISMA-ScR. PubMed, Scopus, EBSCOhost, Taylor and Francis Online, and ScienceDirect were searched, with the final search conducted on 26 January 2026, supplemented by manual searches of relevant reference lists. Eligible studies included adults aged ≥18 years post-stroke and digital interventions supporting rehabilitation or recovery. We extracted and analyzed 21 source-verified studies descriptively and narratively.
Delivery methods were mapped using a two-dimensional framework. Based on the level of professional interaction, studies were classified as clinician-supported remote rehabilitation (n=8), hybrid or clinician-facilitated digital rehabilitation (n=9), or primarily self-directed or patient-facing interventions (n=4). The technological mechanisms were considered non-mutually exclusive and included digital content or applications, telecommunication, virtual reality or exergaming, wearable or motion-sensing technologies, physiological monitoring, automated feedback or cueing, and remote data monitoring. Intervention content was mapped to motor and mobility exercises, stroke education and self-management, balance and postural training, and task-oriented training or occupational therapy; one study reported remote functional assessment rather than active rehabilitation content (n=1). Reported outcomes were categorized into physical and functional outcomes; emotional, behavioral, and patient-reported outcomes; cognitive and knowledge outcomes; and clinical and health outcomes.
Digital post-stroke interventions comprise diverse combinations of professional support, technological mechanisms, rehabilitation content, and outcomes. The evidence is best interpreted as a descriptive map rather than confirmation of effectiveness. Future studies should more clearly specify intervention components, standardize outcome assessment where appropriate, and examine long-term feasibility, accessibility, and scalability.
Erschienen in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare. Das Abstract steht hier so, wie es veröffentlicht wurde, und bleibt das Werk seiner Autoren; den vollständigen Artikel liest du an der Quelle.
Prognia führt diesen Artikel zum Nachschlagen und für die Aus- und Weiterbildung. Er ist keine medizinische Beratung. Lies immer das Original und halte dich an die aktuellen Leitlinien und lokalen Standards, bevor du danach handelst.
